| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oil Drain Comparisons | |||
| Bus Number | Miles on AMSOIL without being changed | # of petroleum oil changes (based on 4,000-mile interval) | # of AMSOIL oil changes (based on 10,000-mile interval) |
| 4 | 45,465 | 12 | 5 |
| 7 | 71,185 | 18 | 8 |
| 22 | 65,776 | 17 | 7 |
As for the aftermarket full flow oil filters, the original intention was to change them every 6,000 to 10,000 miles, but after careful review of oil analysis results, it was determined that because of the efficiency of the AMSOIL Dual-Gard Filtration System, 10,000- to 12,000-mile intervals were easily obtainable on the full-flow filters.
For demonstration purposes, the BE-110 filter elements remained unchanged for a 2-year period. However, after review, it was determined that under normal conditions it would be beneficial to change them after a 40,000- to 50,000-mile interval.
The chart below compares the levels of wear particles present in the previous conventional oil with the levels present in the AMSOIL as of May 2001.
|
Oil
Analysis Comparison: |
||||||
| Vehicle | Metal | Type of Oil | PPM | Type of Oil | PPM | % Reduction |
| Bus # 4 | Iron (Fe) | Rotella | 170 | AMSOIL | 146 | -14% |
| Copper (Cu) | 34 | 35 | +3% | |||
| Aluminum (Al) | 68 | 16 | -76% | |||
| Lead (Pb) | 26 | 7 | -73% | |||
|
Average |
-44% | |||||
| Bus # 7 | Iron (Fe) | Rotella | 126 | AMSOIL | 53 | -58% |
| Copper (Cu) | 42 | 14 | -67% | |||
| Aluminum (Al) | 98 | 6 | -94% | |||
| Lead (Pb) | 42 | 16 | -62% | |||
|
Average |
-70% | |||||
| Bus # 22 | Iron (Fe) | Rotella | 136 | AMSOIL | 49 | -64% |
| Copper (Cu) | 234 | 10 | -96% | |||
| Aluminum (Al) | 117 | 8 | -93% | |||
| Lead (Pb) | 39 | 0 | -100% | |||
|
Average |
-88% | |||||
| *PPM = Parts Per Million | ||||||
Conclusion
Overall, this field demonstration was highly successful for AMSOIL. The
oil analysis data indicate that AMSOIL products deliver uncompromising
protection and performance. AMSOIL provides longer equipment life and
reduced downtime, longer drain intervals, significant decreases in wear rates
and operating temperatures and dramatic improvement in engine performance when
compared to conventional petroleum oils.
AMSOIL shines in school bus tests
Stop-and-go driving, long idling and severe service conditions make school buses
ideal candidates for superior lubricants. AMSOIL decided to "go to school" on a
fleet of northern Wisconsin school buses to determine if AMSOIL could reduce
engine, transmission and differential wear.
Eleven lnternational School Buses with 345 CID gas engines and Allison automatic transmissions were placed into three demonstration groups. (see chart below)
| Group | No. of buses | AMSOIL Equipment | Miles |
| A | 4 | None (control group) | 56,443 |
| B | 4 | AMSOIL 10w-30 motor oil, 75w-90 gear lube, By-Pass oil filter, Air Filter and ATF fluid | 61,072 |
| C | 3 | AMSOIL 75w-90 gear lube | 32,159 |
Group A used the same oil and filters they had always used.
Group B used AMSOIL in the engine, transmission & differential.
Group C used AMSOIL only in the differential.
The school buses were run for one year (August 1984-August 1985) for a total of 149,674 miles. Petroleum motor oils were changed every 3,000 miles; AMSOIL was changed according to oil analysis. The results, documented below, compare AMSOIL to conventional counterparts on a per-mile basis.
|
Transmission Wear Metals |
||
| PPM per mile (x1000) | Group A | Group B |
| Iron Wear | 2.1 | 1.4 |
| Aluminum Wear | .18 | .05 |
| *PPM = Parts Per Million | ||
| Transmission wear was reduced by 48% when comparing buses using AMSOIL ATF (Group B) to petroleum lubes (Group A). Drivers also reported easier cold-weather operation in these vehicles. |
|
Differential Iron Wear |
|||
| PPM per mile (x1000) | Group A | Group B | Group C |
| Iron Wear | 14.7 | 8.1 | 8.0 |
| *PPM = Parts Per Million | |||
| The differentials of Groups B and C, both equipped with AMSOIL 75w-90 Gear Lube, averaged 44% less wear to iron parts than the petroleum-lubricated parts of Group A. |
|
Engine Oil Wear Particles & Contaminants |
|||
| PPM per mile (x1000) | Group A | Group B | % Reduction |
| Copper Wear | 5.5 | 3.2 | -57% |
| Aluminum Wear | 6.0 | .6 | |
| Iron Wear | 66 | 39 | |
| Silicon (dirt) | 1.2 | 0.4 | -66% |
| % Total Solids before AMSOIL | 48% | -83% | |
| % Total Solids after AMSOIL | 8.0% | ||
| *PPM = Parts Per Million | |||
| Copper, aluminum and iron particles are indicative of the amount of wear taking place inside an engine. AMSOIL-equipped buses (Group B) reduced engine wear by 57% over the petroleum products used by Group A buses. Silicon particles are a good indicator of how much dirt is entering the engine via air-intake. AMSOIL Air Filters reduced airborne dirt and dust migration by 66%. The percentage of total solids is a good indicator for how much an oil is blowing by the pistons, causing deposit formation and reduced engine efficiency. After installation of AMSOIL Products, Group B experienced an 83% reduction in total solids. |
| Search |
|
Product Info |
|
Information for |
|
Resources |
|
Save up to 25% or more by becoming a |
|
Customer Service |
|
|
|
|
|