AMSOIL dyno tested against the competition
The following is taken from a July 1998 issue of "Fast Fours and
Rotaries"
"What do you know about the oil in your car's engine? From the ads, you're
led to believe the most exotic part of a Ferrari's engine is in the sump,"
writes Fast Fours and Rotaries (FFR) (July 1998), an
Australian performance car journal.
"The basic concept of oil is to provide a film of lubrication between two
surfaces, FFR continues, "reducing friction, wear and heat and ensuring
an engine's long life span. But the reality is that while all claim to be
superior, there are some that are better than others. We decided to test most of
the major brands to see how the well-known brands, the ones most of us can
readily buy, shape up in a real-life engine test."
Test Procedure
FFR
chose to test only high quality synthetic oils.
High quality synthetics are each oil makers' top product and high quality
synthetics are "most relevant" to performance enthusiasts. The testers ran
each oil through a "short yet grueling" dynamometer
session followed by professional oil analysis.
Sam Blumenstein, of COME Racing, performed the dyno
testing on his SuperFlow engine dynamometer using a
mildly modified five liter V8. Bill Reid, of Lubrication Management, performed
the oil analyses. Ryco supplied oil filters.
After establishing baseline performance using a mineral oil, the test team
subjected the test oils to three timed sessions at high engine loads, between
each of which were three full-power runs.
"The intent," says
FFR , "was to establish a number of criteria. Firstly, whether any
of the oils would improve horsepower; whether any of the products would lose
viscosity; evaluate [the] ability (or lack thereof) to prematurely wear
components or suffer from discoloration. As it turned out, discoloration didn’t
prove to be a factor.
"We approached ten oil suppliers/manufacturers, informing them of our intention,
and all were reasonably keen and eager to be involved, although Pennzoil
didn’t want to commit and Penrite
flat out said no – a little strange given this company has
actually advertised with and for this [performance] market."
Viscosity Test
FFR first subjected the oils to a test of viscosity retention.
"Note," writes FFR , "that being such a short test it was felt that none
of the oils would lose any of its viscosity rating, and indeed six oils suffered
an inconsequential loss of less than one percent." The other five,
Torco MPZ
,
Shell Helix Ultra , Shell Helix Plus , Hi-Tec HTO and
Castrol R suffered significant
viscosity losses.
|
AMSOIL Series 2000 Synthetic
20W-50 Racing Oil
NO VISCOSITY LOSS REPORTED |
|
Oil
|
Product |
Viscosity Loss % |
Type |
Test # |
|
Torco
|
MPZ |
18% |
Synthetic |
5 & 6 |
|
Shell |
Helix Ultra |
14% |
Synthetic |
8 |
|
Shell |
Helix Plus |
12% |
Petroleum |
1 |
|
Hi-Tec |
HTO |
8% |
Synthetic |
9 |
|
Castrol
|
R |
6% |
Synthetic |
12 |
FFR points out that the loss of
viscosity suffered by the five oils was very rapid. "Under normal conditions
it’s suggested oil which loses viscosity this quickly would be subject to
significant losses over 5000 km [8045 miles]. Indeed, one would be suspect of
the potential for increased wear over this period."
Wear Metal Test
Oils inhibit wear by inhibiting metal to metal contact of engine parts. To test
each oil’s ability to protect parts from contact and
wear, FFR subjected each oil to a test of wear metal generation. Their
test "indicates the size and number of wear particles for
each oil. The higher the rating the greater number and size of wear
particles," writes FFR .
|
AMSOIL Series 2000 Synthetic
20W-50 Racing Oil had the
LOWEST WEAR METAL GENERATION |
|
Rating
|
Oil |
Average particle size
|
Overall (micron) |
Test # |
|
#1 |
Amsoil
Series 2000 |
5-10 micron |
5-50 micron |
10 |
|
#2 |
Hi-Tec HTO |
15-20 micron |
10-60 micron |
9 |
|
#3 |
BP Visco 5000 |
15-20 micron |
15-60 micron |
4 |
|
#4 |
Shell Helix Ultra |
15-25 micron |
15-60 micron |
8 |
|
#5 |
Shell Helix Plus |
10-20 micron |
15-50 Micron |
1 |
|
#6 |
Mobil 1 5W-50 |
20-25 micron |
15-60 micron |
3 |
|
#7 |
Mobil 1 OW-40 |
15-20 micron |
15-50 micron |
11 |
|
#8 |
Castrol
R |
20-30 micron |
15-100 Micron |
12 |
|
#9 |
Torco
|
15-20 micron |
15-100 Micron |
5 & 6 |
|
#10 |
Royal Purple |
15-20 micron |
15-100 Micron |
7 |
|
#11 |
Castrol
SLX |
20-25 micron |
15-100 Micron |
2 |
Horsepower
FFR
averaged three runs per oil, noting power
figures at 500 rpm increments between 3000 and 5000 rpm and noting peak power
and torque. While the engine FFR used for testing was a large tolerance
engine for which a 20W-50 grade oil is ideal, some of
the oil manufacturers supplied 0W-30 grade oils for testing. The low grade
viscosity oils delivered somewhat greater horsepower than the high grade oils
did, but as FFR notes, "around 4000 rpm the power produced is very
similar across the range and it’s only really the top end where there are
substantial differences. That said, the AMSOIL
[20W-50], Castrol R [10W-60] and
Mobil 5W-50 prove themselves very well."
Conclusion
“Although we’ve provided criteria to pick
and choose an oil, the stand-out to us appears to be
the AMSOIL, rating well in the viscosity
and producing good horsepower."
“With the variety of grades, use this test as a guide but
always follow the manufacturer’s recommendation. But if we were to stick our
neck out in anticipation of the lawsuits, from the information we gathered
specific to the supplied oils in the test, we’d rate the oils in the
following order":
-
AMSOIL
-
BP Visco 5000
-
Mobil 1
-
Mobil 1
-
Hi-Tec HTO
-
Shell Helix Ultra
-
Royal Purple
-
Castrol R
-
Castrol SLX
-
Torco
| |
|